Market Economy under the Rule of Law
Premier Li Keqiang has repeatedly emphasized the need to streamline administration and delegate power, highlighting the principles of market economy, wherein items that do not appear on the list of government powers are deemed not permissible; items that do not appear on the negative list which defines areas off-limits to businesses are deemed permissible; and all items on the list of government responsibilities must be fulfilled. We can only thus ensure efficient operation of the market economy.
The future positioning of government actually entails exchanging the omnipotent government of the planned economy era for a service-oriented government – a regulatory government under the rule of law that shoulders its responsibilities. The key lies in placing power within the domain of the rule of law.
Yan Qingmin, vice chairman of the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC), summarized this move in three steps: first, streamline the administrative license in order to supervise and strictly constrain governmental regulatory behavior to within the legal framework; second, authorize provincial and subordinate regulatory agencies to carry out administrative examinations and approvals; third, repeal, delete and standardize administrative power to make it more transparent and uniform.
Chen Wenhui, vice chairman of China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC), confirmed that the CIRC is proactively promoting marketization reform by delegating power, for example, by reducing advance administrative examinations and approvals and transferring management rights to market entities, so strengthening insurance innovation. In 2012, the CIRC dramatically expanded the domain and scale of insurance investment. The system of investment product regulation has also changed from examination and approval to registration. The past two years have thus witnessed remarkable reform achievements.
Challenges to Financial Innovation and Regulation
President Xi Jinping said during the 2014 APEC Economic Leaders’ Week in Beijing that if innovation was the new engine of China’s development, then reform is its ignition. In the past 30-plus years, financial innovation in China has promoted reforms of national banks and state-owned enterprises and gradually formed an investment and financing mechanism in line with the market. This has resulted in the establishment and development of a capital market amid the transition of the national economy. It has also enriched and perfected China’s financial system and products. At present, the new economy as represented by the Internet has totally overturned the traditional industrial and financial mode and invigorated the financial market. It has moreover broken the barriers of administrative monopoly, so pushing the government to change its regulatory model and vitalize ongoing reforms.
Zhuang Xinyi, vice chairman of China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), listed the characteristics of financial innovation in the new era: first, as innovation accelerates, new mechanisms and products steadily appear; second, innovation is not limited to a certain market or industry, and growing cross-market financial products have expanded connectivity among different markets and industries; third, the growing combinations and complexity of financial tools have been greatly enhanced, and individual services offered to real economy bodies.
Chen Wenhui raised the latest financial innovation data. China’s Internet insurance revenue rose from RMB 31.8 billion in 2013 to RMB 62.2 billion during the first three quarters of 2014 – an increase of 195 percent over the total 2013 figure. During the “Double Eleventh Day” (November 11) shopping spree of 2013, the return transportation insurance turnover exceeded 150 million units, earning a world record RMB 90 million. The 2014 Double Eleventh Day saw a new high of 186 million units of return transportation insurance, which translates to a new world record RMB 100 million.
In his remarks on changes the Internet has wrought on the financial market, Yan Qingmin, vice chairman of CBRC, recommended tolerance and a tacit consent to this new phenomenon, as long as it does not pose any regional risk or infringement of CBRC regulations. Since Internet finance began to sprout in China, CBRC has made careful observations and formulated with other related ministries and commissions certain regulations. Yan gave some advice on the supervision: first, appropriate regulation that avoids subjective assumptions; second, coordinated supervision, taking into consideration a large number of cross-industry financial products, which entail supervision of different departments; and third, innovations to the regulatory model.
In 2003, with the establishment of CBRC, China’s financial regulatory system took shape, with three regulatory bodies, comprising CSRC, CIRC, and CBRC as well as the People’s Bank of China (China’s central bank), responsible for supervising different fields. However, the changing financial market and emerging cross-industry financial products and operations pose new challenge to the existing regulatory system. Yan pointed out that better coordination among different regulatory organizations is necessary in order to avoid regulatory gaps and consequent inefficiencies that could obstruct future financial industry development. Yan emphasized that supervision, industry, monetary, and fiscal policies should be interconnected.
Encouraging financial innovation, however, does not mean that there is no bottomline to financial regulation. Regulators agree that they should not only support financial innovation, but also maintain a basic financial order to obviate systematic or regional risk while safeguarding the principles of openness, justice, and fairness. Premier Li Keqiang once said that all items on the list of government responsibilities should be fulfilled. Guarding against financial risk is the lawful responsibility of financial regulatory agencies, and sticking to that bottomline is the acknowledged boundary of financial innovation.
