The
Current System of Personal Income Tax Calls for Prompt Revision
By
WANG ZHIPENG

Tax collection in grass-roots tax
bureaus is being computerized. |
Beijing's revenue from personal income
tax in 2001 was 8 billion yuan, an increase of 42 percent, and
the amount of tax received from high-income earners increased
2.6 fold. From September to November 2001, high-income earners
paid taxes of 60 million yuan they had previously evaded. In
the first half of 2002, Beijing defined its key taxpayers, that
is, those with an annual income exceeding 100,000 yuan. According
to this definition, the tax-paying situation of at least 30,000
people is under control. Revisions to the Individual Income
Tax Law, which has been under discussion for a year, are approaching
their end, and individual income has again become the focus
of attention.
Rapid economic development has resulted in
a widening gap between the rich and the poor, and personal income
tax, while increasing by large margins, has failed to play its
due regulatory role. In 1980, China collected only 160,000 yuan
in personal income tax, but this figure jumped to 99.6 billion
yuan in 2001, making income tax fourth highest of China's tax
revenues. However, within personal income tax, the proportion
of high-income items, such as remuneration from personal services,
and from production and operation, increased at a lesser, slower
rate. Statistics indicate that of China's 7,000 billion yuan
personal bank savings, 80 percent belongs to less than 20 percent
of the depositors, and the income tax they pay amounts to less
than 10 percent of total personal income tax. Also, the GDP
proportion of personal income tax lags far behind that of other
low-income countries. Generally speaking, China's taxation system
is ineffective in collecting personal income tax, and most of
those on high income do not pay the appropriate amount of tax.
Two main factors have caused difficulty in
the collection of personal income tax. On the one hand, the
system of primary distribution is not standardized, a system
of personal credit has not been established, and the taxation
system is flawed. The existing mode of tax classification is
inequitable, and tax evaders are not severely penalized. All
of this has resulted in serious tax evasion. On the other hand,
according to the current taxation system, it is difficult to
calculate and effectively monitor personal incomes. As a result,
not all due taxes are collected. Methods of collection are backward,
and procedures are complicated. According to the current system,
tax rates vary according to different categories of income,
so the amounts of tax imposed on similar levels of income differ.
For instance, the highest tax rate on salaries is 45 percent,
and the highest on property income is 20 percent. The tax rate
for income from hard labor is, however, much higher - an obvious
shortcoming. At present, the greater portion of personal income
tax is withheld by the workplace, which is most easily controlled
by tax authorities. As a result, wage earners become the absolute
main body of taxpayers, while most high-income earners evade
taxes by diverse means, such as opening accounts in several
banks, and cash transactions. This is completely unjust, and
its negative influence has caused huge losses in social efficiency.
Deficiencies in the personal income tax system
have aroused the Chinese government's attention. Revision of
the Individual Income Tax Law was put on the legislative work
agenda last year, and governments at various levels are intensifying
their efforts to penalize tax evasion. Liu Xiaoqing, famous
TV and film actress and millionairess, is currently under judicial
investigation for tax evasion, which demonstrates the government's
determination to crack down on such violations. With the approaching
election of the new administration, the revised Individual Income
Tax Law will not be promulgated in a short period of time, but
reforms to the current tax system are inevitable. They have
two aims. First, to increase government revenue; and second,
to narrow the income gap. The latter is more important than
the former. The polarization between the rich and the poor in
China is a source of great concern, and it is imperative that
this gap in income be narrowed. The solution to this problem
will effectively kill two birds with one stone.
The narrowing of gaps in income will help
stabilize society. In general, the middle-income bracket constitutes
a strong foundation for the country's steady economic development,
and maintaining a suitable parity between high- and low-income
groups encourages innovation and competition. In the past five
or six years, enterprise reform has resulted in large numbers
of workers becoming unemployed, thus broadening the gap between
rich and poor, and causing disturbances in certain localities.
According to statistics provided by the Ministry of Labor and
Social Security, low-income households in China's cities and
towns represent 31.79 percent, and lower middle-income households
32.36 percent, their combination making up 64.15 percent. This
proportion is too large, so the ratio of middle-income households
should be increased by means of re-distribution of income. The
system of personal income tax should be improved to regulate
high-incomes, and to maintain social stability.
An increase in the proportion of the middle-income
bracket will promote economic growth. The role of the pro-active
financial policy implemented by the government becomes more
limited day by day, and due to recession of the global economy,
promoting economic growth through expanding exports is not satisfactory.
In China, the most populous country with the largest potential
market, the lack of consumption power is without doubt a huge
drawback, and relates to the current pattern of income distribution.
The high-income bracket with the greatest purchasing power makes
up only a small proportion of the population, yet they have
low consumption motivation, while the majority of the population
that is bent on high consumption lacks purchasing power. Increasing
the proportion of middle-incomes will, therefore, effectively
promote consumption. It is only by emphasizing both investment
and consumption that China may realize rapid economic development
in the long term.
WANG ZHIPENG
is studying for a doctorate at the Economic Management School
of Tsinghua University.